Western leaders ‘don’t end up’ in ICC – ex-MEP (VIDEO)

Major states rarely face the International Criminal Court while the “defeated” and “powerless” are most at risk, Gunnar Beck has told RT Western leaders are far less likely to face the International Criminal Court (ICC) for conduct comparable to that alleged against officials from weaker states, former MEP Gunnar Beck has told RT. The “defeated” and “powerless” are most at risk while leaders of major nations are largely shielded, he argued. The ICC was established in 2002 under the Rome Statute to try individuals accused of genocide, war crimes and crimes against humanity, but has faced longstanding accusations of political bias and selective justice. In an interview with RT on Tuesday, Beck said that “major powers don’t end up” in the ICC, adding that international organizations remain “largely dominated by Western powers and their sort of allies and vassals.

” Invoking Soviet leader Joseph Stalin’s famous dictum that “victors are not judged,” he argued that the court’s record largely reflects the same principle. Selective justice eroding trust in international law – expert (VIDEO) “The same acts committed by a head of state of a major power, and especially a Western power, are far less likely, if not to say are altogether unlikely, to be prosecuted or brought before the court,” he said. He argued that the pattern extends beyond whether countries formally belong to the court. Russia, China, the US, and India are not parties to the Rome Statute, but Beck said political power also affects the likelihood of prosecution. “If you ask me, is a Russian leader more likely to be at least prosecuted before the court than an American leader, I’d say yes, even if that were for similar deeds,” he said. “So we certainly see a discrepancy here. ” Criticism of the ICC has intensified…