FACT CHECK: No reports of SC order ousting Marcos

Claim: The Supreme Court (SC) has ruled on a case against President Ferdinand Marcos Jr. , removing him from office. Rating : FALSE Why we fact-checked this: A YouTube video uploaded by the channel “PINAS BALITA TV” on October 26, 2026, made this claim. The video is titled: “NAKARMA NA! KAPAPASOK LANG! BEBE EM TALUNAN sa mga KAS0NG NA1SAMPA sa KANYA sa K0RTE SUPR3MA? ” (Karma at last! Just in! BBM loses in cases filed against him at the Supreme Court? ). Its thumbnail and accompanying captions include: “Pinatalsik! Lumayas ka sa Palasyo! ” (Ousted! Get out of the Palace! ), further claiming that the SC has finally acted. As of writing, the video has garnered 21,589 views. The facts: No official announcements, press releases, or SC decisions confirm the removal of Marcos from Malacañang.

The SC has no constitutional authority to oust a sitting president, who enjoys absolute immunity from suit while in office. Article XI, Section 2 of the 1987 Philippine Constitution says the president may only be removed from office “on impeachment for, and conviction of, culpable violation of the Constitution, treason, bribery, graft and corruption, other high crimes, or betrayal of public trust. ” No impeachment case: At present, no impeachment complaint can proceed against Marcos because he is also immune from new impeachment proceedings until February 2027, after the House of Representatives junked two impeachment complaints filed against him in February 2026 for lack of substance. Under Article XI, Section 3 of the Constitution, no impeachment proceeding can be initiated against the same official more than once within a period of one year. As of writing, only Vice President Sara Duterte is undergoing an impeachment trial in the Senate impeachment court. Lack of evidence: The video…